🔗 Share this article

This is Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it feels like it’s time for a re-evaluation. Throughout its history, an observance that was initiated as a celebration and reminder of heritage, traditions and links between global Black communities, has developed a commercial tone, expanding to include functions where Black people are compensated to speak with Caucasian groups about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The surge has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Observance

Initially celebrated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the second week of February. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Currently it is marked not only in the North America in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the UK, Deutschland, Ireland and the Holland.

The observance has transformed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the accounts of colonial slavery and struggles for equality, and greater focus on prominent Black figures in public life, creative fields, and advocacy, and extensively acknowledging the impact Black people have made to influence the nation. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the way the celebration is observed is a indication of the contemporary political context. How it evolves is a instructive case in how co-option leads to weakening: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the purpose of it, which is to address structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it occurs this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the shape of the Reform party is top in opinion ratings. In the recent season we observed the largest far-right rally in British history. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a position where a elected representative feels emboldened to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Meanwhile, far-right parties are expanding in the EU as a entirety.

In the United States, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, often successfully, to the highest courts of the country. A effort to remove the history of people of color and narrative from the records is in progress. One of Donald Trump's initial presidential directives targeted the museum of African American legacy, and the prestigious establishment, accusing them of a coordinated and broad attempt to alter the country's historical narrative” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

In this context, the month represents how insufficiently it can be influential if it is restricted to either dutiful corporate observances, or politically neutered festivities of historical achievements, rather than challenging the realities of the present. It also shows how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the wider consistent effort that is required. Denise Miller, a professor at a learning establishment, put it best when she voiced worries about the temporary “tokenism” of the celebration. “The difficulty with taking a tokenistic approach”, she wrote, “is that it often means that Black History Month becomes a fleeting performance rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Reconsidering, Not Discarding

Establishing how to adapt, revise and extend initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such moments of dejection and worry is a treacherous thing. There is a temptation to just do away with observances such as Black History Month completely, thinking they are simply not fit for purpose, or are vestiges of an era that has failed to deliver.

But despite everything, Black History Month, and in fact the whole broad system and legacy of activism for racial justice – grassroots Black Lives Matter organisations, DEI programs, and yes, even those talks to businesses – form an infrastructure that a significant effort has been invested in. It is there not merely to decline as the situation evolves (and in fact, declines), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a fresh vibrant Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be extended beyond a brief observance: something that is distributed across all seasons (as some institutions are already starting to implement), sections of its curriculum (particularly around prominent figures of color) included in school curriculums. It would also be a time that does not avoid political issues, and allows opportunity for individuals, particularly young people, to express their concerns and stories. What purpose serves mere awareness of the history when it fails to address the contemporary truth of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the public spaces? Organizations who observe it should not be comforted with the non-confrontational words of hidden discrimination and awareness of minor insults, but faced with the dangers that affect everyone if fight against prejudice is not approached earnestly. In short, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and adaptive. Maybe an complete renaming is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.