Skip to content
Vardagsmagasin

Venezuela Is Poised to Define President Trump's Political Legacy - and America's Position in the World

Following launching a night of shock and awe in Venezuela, Donald Trump now appears to be getting into the state-building business.

In a remarkable press conference at his Mar-a-Lago resort on Saturday morning, the commander-in-chief declared that US military forces had successfully captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife in an late-night operation in Caracas.

Trump then announced that a group including Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth, collaborating with Venezuelans, would be seizing the reins of the beleaguered nation.

"We are going to administer the country until such time as we can do a secure, proper and judicious transition," he said.

What precisely "managing the nation" actually means is uncertain, but the vow signifies an dramatic shift in direction for the president, full of inconsistencies and significant obstacles.

A president who campaigned against "endless conflicts", who sharply criticised past US efforts at regime change and who vowed to implement an "America first" international policy is now staking his administration on successfully revitalizing a South American nation whose economy is collapsed and whose governmental stability has been eroded by decades of dictatorship.

Yet, Trump was unwaveringly upbeat.

He claimed his administration has a "unblemished record of winning" – and that this will be no different. He pledged to enlist American energy companies to repair Venezuela's crumbling industrial infrastructure, providing funds for the American rebuilding project and benefitting the Venezuelan people.

He declined to rule out deploying American soldiers to Venezuela to progress these efforts. "We do not fear boots on the ground…we had boots on the ground last night," he informed reporters.

Trump, a sharp critic of the US invasion of Iraq, will now have to consider the words of one of the American planners of the Iraq War, Secretary of State Colin Powell: "You break it, you bought it."

An Altered International Stance

The US has redefined Venezuela's prospects – whether for good or ill.

Trump took office nearly a year ago promising to be a peacemaker, but over the past year he has proven that he is more than willing to use armed force worldwide.

In the past week, he ordered air strikes on Syria and Nigeria. In 2025, he struck nuclear facilities in Iran, alleged narco-trafficking boats in the Caribbean, insurgent groups in Yemen, armed groups in Somalia and Islamic militants in Iraq.

In contrast to past operations, which have mostly involved missiles and warplanes that minimize the exposure of American forces to harm, Trump's Venezuela operation – and his pledges to the future of that nation – are notably distinct.

His goal, he said during his briefing, is to "make Venezuela great again."

Reactions from Allies and Critics

That play on Trump's "Make America Great Again" – or Maga - slogan might prove tough for some of Trump's backers to digest.

Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene, a former Trump ally who split from the president after accusing him of abandoning his core supporters, was quick to criticize the president's actions on social media.

"Public outrage with our own government's never ending use of force and backing for foreign wars is justified because we are compelled to fund it," she stated. "This is what many in Maga thought they voted to end. How mistaken we were."

Another prominent Trump critic, Republican Congressman Thomas Massie, contrasted the official rationale for Maduro's arrest – on weapons and cocaine trafficking charges – with Trump's explanation that the operation was to retake confiscated US oil and stop fentanyl production.

Most Republican lawmakers supported the president, with House Speaker Mike Johnson describing the armed intervention against a "criminal regime" as "decisive and justified".

Policy Rationales and Worldwide Consequences

During his appearance, the president said the Venezuelan operation furthered his "America First" agenda because it guaranteed US hemispheric security and provided a reliable source of oil.

He dusted off the Monroe Doctrine – an nineteenth-century American foreign policy that declared the Western Hemisphere should be free from influence by European powers – and renamed it the "Donroe Doctrine."

The action in Venezuela, Trump said, shows that "US preeminence in the Western Hemisphere will not be challenged again."

The purpose of the new US national security strategy, he said, was to "protect commerce, territory and resources that are central to our security interests." He branded the Western Hemisphere as America's "sphere of influence."

Trump's decision to capture Maduro will provoke broader questions in international relations, however, and affect American relations with the world's other major military powers.

The Chinese government released a statement voicing surprise and denouncing what it said was a irresponsible attack on a independent country.

During the previous administration, the US offered similar censures of Russia after its invasion of Ukraine. Now the Trump administration is attempting to broker a ceasefire between those two nations – one that has often appeared to be more favourable to the Russian side.

Don Bacon, a centrist Republican congressman, expressed worry about the signal Trump's actions might send.

"My main worry is now Russia will use this to justify their unlawful and barbaric operations against Ukraine, or China to justify an attack of Taiwan."

Political Criticism and Constitutional Questions

Trump's Democratic opponents were sharper.

"America should not be managing other countries for any purpose," said a senator who serves on the Foreign Relations Committee. "We should have learned by now not to get involved in endless wars and regime change missions that carry devastating consequences for Americans."

Another senior Democratic lawmaker said Maduro is a lawbreaker and a autocrat with a record of human rights abuses. But he censured Trump's choice not to inform legislative leaders prior to launching the attack.

"The President has the constitutional responsibility to abide by the law and uphold democratic norms in the United States," he said. "That is what placing America First demands."

Trump, in his remarks, explained that he opted not to inform Congress because he was worried they would "leak" particulars of the operation before the attack.

An Uncertain Future

That military operation was a triumph – with no American casualties and limited harm to US assets. Trump, with his typical confidence, portrayed the operation as a "daring raid" and "among the most astonishing, effective and impressive demonstrations of American military might and proficiency in American history."

Now he is betting his presidency on that success continuing, as the US says it will assume responsibility for administering and reconstructing Venezuela - though what that actually means remains unclear. He and his administration must strengthen a nation that has been in chaos for decades while calming a region that is bound to be apprehensive of what Trump's international strategy has planned for them.

About the author

Janet Jones

Lena är en erfaren livsstilsbloggare med passion för heminredning och hållbarhet. Hon delar praktiska råd och kreativa idéer.

Vardagsmagasin

Type to search articles.